|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 2:55:45 GMT -7
Folks, I am so good, I even amaze myself. BEGGING Moe to come over, his first issue is that the site wants him to register just to look around  ?? That left him cold. ....still working on my end, maybe a free login weekend pass for now ? I thought you and Moe were tight ? Doesn’t sound like he trusts your judgement at all. I must question how tight you baggies really are. You gotta do better than this, if you want anyone else to buy into this “Freak is so good” hype. C’mon mann.... I’ll tell you what, you just tell Moe to text me if he needs some convincing....I’ll deliver (if you fail, until it hurts) Well "Administrator" that was fairly nasty. But everyone can have a bad post. I'll check out your next reply to me. I'm sure it will be much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 3:05:24 GMT -7
Two pieces of free advice and insight-------while my recruitment process has been VASTLY SUCCESSFUL, it is still ongoing. One lure is the easy sign up. Might we delay the review process a little to capture loose fish more easily ? How long is the review process now ? Has the spam bots been a major problem to date ? Thanks, Freak It’s hard to pinpoint an exact time on the review process, so I’m just gonna give you a range...anywhere between 31 seconds and 31 years. I don’t think the review process is really up for debate, but we’ll discuss the possibility of allowing viewing before registering. In regards to the spam bots question: first ask yourself how confident are you that I am not a spam bot...then see if you can answer your own question. In all seriousness though, good feedback...as stated above, we will definitely discuss. Nope. Two nasty grams in a row "Administrator". Review process up for debate ? Who is debating ? I labeled it free advice. I'm not debating anything. Take it, leave it, whatever. Multiple complaints have come in that people want to view prior to registering. That's a non-debatable fact. Not sure where your vitriol/ animosity is coming from. You asked for questions. I merely had questions and suggestions. This is EXACTLY what happened to the CMB. And Brother, I do mean EXACTLY. I would hope this new forum could be about new beginnings. The old ways failed, and failed hard. We have to learn from that in order to be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by chopper31 on Mar 2, 2019 3:18:28 GMT -7
It’s hard to pinpoint an exact time on the review process, so I’m just gonna give you a range...anywhere between 31 seconds and 31 years. I don’t think the review process is really up for debate, but we’ll discuss the possibility of allowing viewing before registering. In regards to the spam bots question: first ask yourself how confident are you that I am not a spam bot...then see if you can answer your own question. In all seriousness though, good feedback...as stated above, we will definitely discuss. Nope. Two nasty grams in a row "Administrator". Review process up for debate ? Who is debating ? I labeled it free advice. I'm not debating anything. Take it, leave it, whatever. Multiple complaints have come in that people want to view prior to registering. That's a non-debatable fact. Not sure where your vitriol/ animosity is coming from. You asked for questions. I merely had questions and suggestions. This is EXACTLY what happened to the CMB. And Brother, I do mean EXACTLY. I would hope this new forum could be about new beginnings. The old ways failed, and failed hard. We have to learn from that in order to be better. LMAO !!! Hey Freak - i actually have a question for you now...this morning, did you have to login before you could view the board ?  After you answer that, see if you can find out why I found this post sooooo entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 3:20:52 GMT -7
Nope. Two nasty grams in a row "Administrator". Review process up for debate ? Who is debating ? I labeled it free advice. I'm not debating anything. Take it, leave it, whatever. Multiple complaints have come in that people want to view prior to registering. That's a non-debatable fact. Not sure where your vitriol/ animosity is coming from. You asked for questions. I merely had questions and suggestions. This is EXACTLY what happened to the CMB. And Brother, I do mean EXACTLY. I would hope this new forum could be about new beginnings. The old ways failed, and failed hard. We have to learn from that in order to be better. LMAO !!! Hey Freak - i actually have a question for you now...this morning, did you have to login before you could view the board ? After you answer that, see if you can find out why I found this post sooooo entertaining. Not sure. I had my computer save my login. So it auto logs me in when I go to the site.
|
|
|
|
Post by chopper31 on Mar 2, 2019 3:21:24 GMT -7
I thought you and Moe were tight ? Doesn’t sound like he trusts your judgement at all. I must question how tight you baggies really are. You gotta do better than this, if you want anyone else to buy into this “Freak is so good” hype. C’mon mann.... I’ll tell you what, you just tell Moe to text me if he needs some convincing....I’ll deliver (if you fail, until it hurts) Well "Administrator" that was fairly nasty. But everyone can have a bad post. I'll check out your next reply to me. I'm sure it will be much better. Truthfully, I have no doubts that you will deliver us Moe. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow....but sooner rather than later he will be here, because of you. I learned a long long time ago, never to doubt you.
|
|
|
|
Post by chopper31 on Mar 2, 2019 3:35:25 GMT -7
LMAO !!! Hey Freak - i actually have a question for you now...this morning, did you have to login before you could view the board ? After you answer that, see if you can find out why I found this post sooooo entertaining. Not sure. I had my computer save my login. So it auto logs me in when I go to the site. In the final line of my “nasty gram”, I said it was good feedback, and that we would discuss...we did, and decided to open things back up for viewing, without logging in. TBH, I’m not sure where the nasty part of that post was...maybe the joke about between 31 seconds and 31 years ? My goodness Freak, have you ever made a similar type joke, I dunno using the number 51 ?? Maybe try re-reading my “nasty gram”, and then your response, and see if there was possibly an overreaction there ?
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 3:55:46 GMT -7
Not sure. I had my computer save my login. So it auto logs me in when I go to the site. In the final line of my “nasty gram”, I said it was good feedback, and that we would discuss...we did, and decided to open things back up for viewing, without logging in. TBH, I’m not sure where the nasty part of that post was...maybe the joke about between 31 seconds and 31 years ? My goodness Freak, have you ever made a similar type joke, I dunno using the number 51 ?? Maybe try re-reading my “nasty gram”, and then your response, and see if there was possibly an overreaction there ? I tried it in a different browser, and it worked ! I could view everything. I just think its smarter in the beginning to allow new/potential members ease of access. A lot of times that's the hook. They will read material that peaks their interest, they want to jump in with input. They have to join for input. That's an effective "gotcha" ploy. Time proven. Glad you open it up. Later, if the restriction works better for the site, merely reimpose the restriction.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 4:02:41 GMT -7
Not sure. I had my computer save my login. So it auto logs me in when I go to the site. In the final line of my “nasty gram”, I said it was good feedback, and that we would discuss...we did, and decided to open things back up for viewing, without logging in. TBH, I’m not sure where the nasty part of that post was...maybe the joke about between 31 seconds and 31 years ? My goodness Freak, have you ever made a similar type joke, I dunno using the number 51 ?? Maybe try re-reading my “nasty gram”, and then your response, and see if there was possibly an overreaction there ? You see, you had to get the nasty in, then you caught yourself, and fluffed the end of the post. I'm not the dumbest kid on the block, I'm the second dumbest. Here's the bottom line: You and I have had some rough past. I want that to be the past. So I am taking 51% of the blame (of course its 51). We don't have to go to dinner together, but we can have a civil discourse together. We'll have to find some common ground. Everyone on here can revert to being fellow Chargers fans. Except you. You aren't one. You aren't even an NFL fan. I am not stating those in a bad way. Just makes the common ground tougher. But let's just say its on me, and I'll have to find the common area. Fair enough ?
|
|
|
|
Post by chopper31 on Mar 2, 2019 5:48:11 GMT -7
In the final line of my “nasty gram”, I said it was good feedback, and that we would discuss...we did, and decided to open things back up for viewing, without logging in. TBH, I’m not sure where the nasty part of that post was...maybe the joke about between 31 seconds and 31 years ? My goodness Freak, have you ever made a similar type joke, I dunno using the number 51 ?? Maybe try re-reading my “nasty gram”, and then your response, and see if there was possibly an overreaction there ? You see, you had to get the nasty in, then you caught yourself, and fluffed the end of the post. I'm not the dumbest kid on the block, I'm the second dumbest. Here's the bottom line: You and I have had some rough past. I want that to be the past. So I am taking 51% of the blame (of course its 51). We don't have to go to dinner together, but we can have a civil discourse together. We'll have to find some common ground. Everyone on here can revert to being fellow Chargers fans. Except you. You aren't one. You aren't even an NFL fan. I am not stating those in a bad way. Just makes the common ground tougher. But let's just say its on me, and I'll have to find the common area. Fair enough ? I’m still scratching my head over where the nasty part of that post was. Is using my number 31 in a joking matter offensive these days ? I honestly don’t know where the nastiness was. As for us having a rocky past, that’s news to me as well. Were we always on the opposite side of the fence ? Sure...but that was by design, an act, WWE style. You were always in character, and so was I. You are very well aware of that too, as we shared several PM’s behind the scenes, discussing this stuff. I’d say about the only time one of us broke character, was in the smack shack a few years back...I lost an avi bet to Canmore, and was forced to wear a Potatohead avi for a week. In a touching moment, you joined me in the punishment. That was cool...but after that it was back to normal, and I wouldn’t have wanted it any other way. Personally, I would love our staged banter to continue, but if you are too sensitive these days to participate, I will make sure that my posts towards you are filled with nothing but kindness and the utmost degree of seriousness. That includes taking all of the “accomplishments” which you gloat about at face value. Your call...
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 6:35:46 GMT -7
You see, you had to get the nasty in, then you caught yourself, and fluffed the end of the post. I'm not the dumbest kid on the block, I'm the second dumbest. Here's the bottom line: You and I have had some rough past. I want that to be the past. So I am taking 51% of the blame (of course its 51). We don't have to go to dinner together, but we can have a civil discourse together. We'll have to find some common ground. Everyone on here can revert to being fellow Chargers fans. Except you. You aren't one. You aren't even an NFL fan. I am not stating those in a bad way. Just makes the common ground tougher. But let's just say its on me, and I'll have to find the common area. Fair enough ? I’m still scratching my head over where the nasty part of that post was. Is using my number 31 in a joking matter offensive these days ? I honestly don’t know where the nastiness was. As for us having a rocky past, that’s news to me as well. Were we always on the opposite side of the fence ? Sure...but that was by design, an act, WWE style. You were always in character, and so was I. You are very well aware of that too, as we shared several PM’s behind the scenes, discussing this stuff. I’d say about the only time one of us broke character, was in the smack shack a few years back...I lost an avi bet to Canmore, and was forced to wear a Potatohead avi for a week. In a touching moment, you joined me in the punishment. That was cool...but after that it was back to normal, and I wouldn’t have wanted it any other way. Personally, I would love our staged banter to continue, but if you are too sensitive these days to participate, I will make sure that my posts towards you are filled with nothing but kindness and the utmost degree of seriousness. That includes taking all of the “accomplishments” which you gloat about at face value. Your call... Eh, I've answered this the best I could. We'll move on to Moe. Woodeye and I have contacted him. He's still tiffed. I think give him time, he'll come around. I never got to the bottom of him being tiffed. But I think woodeye and I are guilty by association of whatever the issues are. I would think you will be too. Just guesswork on my part.
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Mar 2, 2019 6:36:17 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Mar 2, 2019 6:40:34 GMT -7
You guys sound like a couple teenage girls... Why don't we keep this to football and the Chargers? Take the CMB past to Facebook arguments.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 2, 2019 6:43:47 GMT -7
You guys sound like a couple teenage girls... Why don't we keep this to football and the Chargers? Leave the CMB past to Facebook arguments. There's a CMB on Facebook ?
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Mar 2, 2019 6:47:44 GMT -7
You guys sound like a couple teenage girls... Why don't we keep this to football and the Chargers? Take the CMB past to Facebook arguments. There's a CMB on Facebook ? Fixed it for ya. Love you guys!
|
|
|
|
Post by ChargerTom on Mar 2, 2019 8:20:41 GMT -7
Have you guys checked out the new theme and color layout that Chopper installed overnight?
To view:
Click on profile at top of page.
Click on Edit Profile.
Click on Settings.
Click on Option 1.
Click Save. Refresh page.
See what you think. I'm loving it! So are my eyes!
|
|
?? That left him cold. ....still working on my end, maybe a free login weekend pass for now ?
