|
Post by totallybolted on Jun 15, 2021 21:25:58 GMT -7
you can't always control the match ups. Well... not 100%, no. But you can ensure you don't have a linebacker covering a top 5 fastest in the league receiving threat. but i thought you said not 100%? I get the point. Its not a good match up, but went is it ever with Hill. My point was to throw some light on the shade. I don't think Bradley was horrible. nor do I think Tranquill was throwing him under the bus. To McRug's point, I agree, it was probably more often then they wanted
|
|
cthommes
Drivel Superstar
Posts: 1,391
Member is Online
|
Post by cthommes on Jun 15, 2021 22:06:17 GMT -7
Well... not 100%, no. But you can ensure you don't have a linebacker covering a top 5 fastest in the league receiving threat. but i thought you said not 100%? I get the point. Its not a good match up, but went is it ever with Hill. My point was to throw some light on the shade. I don't think Bradley was horrible. nor do I think Tranquill was throwing him under the bus. To McRug's point, I agree, it was probably more often then they wanted No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline.
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 16, 2021 3:05:59 GMT -7
but i thought you said not 100%? I get the point. Its not a good match up, but went is it ever with Hill. My point was to throw some light on the shade. I don't think Bradley was horrible. nor do I think Tranquill was throwing him under the bus. To McRug's point, I agree, it was probably more often then they wanted No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. There is a couple of bottom lines to be drawn from all of this. You/they can take some some shots at the old DC. No problem he's gone now, right ? Here comes last year's best DC in the NFL. Should be great, right ? Here's the problem: It's freaking GO time now, with no excuses. If Glass Tranquill wants to say Hill broke his ankle trying to keep up with him, I would believe him. But talky talk is over. The best DC is here, that means failure can only be found in the personnel now. Player ability and execution is now magnified 200%. I think Tranquill is missing that huge point.
|
|
|
Post by joemcrugby on Jun 16, 2021 3:51:53 GMT -7
No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. There is a couple of bottom lines to be drawn from all of this. You/they can take some some shots at the old DC. No problem he's gone now, right ? Here comes last year's best DC in the NFL. Should be great, right ? Here's the problem: It's freaking GO time now, with no excuses. If Glass Tranquill wants to say Hill broke his ankle trying to keep up with him, I would believe him. But talky talk is over. The best DC is here, that means failure can only be found in the personnel now. Player ability and execution is now magnified 200%. I think Tranquill is missing that huge point. ”Glass” already? He was 100% healthy his rookie season and freakishly snapped his ankle accident on a slick field out of the starting gate in 2021.
|
|
|
Post by totallybolted on Jun 16, 2021 9:11:37 GMT -7
There is a couple of bottom lines to be drawn from all of this. You/they can take some some shots at the old DC. No problem he's gone now, right ? Here comes last year's best DC in the NFL. Should be great, right ? Here's the problem: It's freaking GO time now, with no excuses. If Glass Tranquill wants to say Hill broke his ankle trying to keep up with him, I would believe him. But talky talk is over. The best DC is here, that means failure can only be found in the personnel now. Player ability and execution is now magnified 200%. I think Tranquill is missing that huge point. ”Glass” already? He was 100% healthy his rookie season and freakishly snapped his ankle accident on a slick field out of the starting gate in 2021. I thought "Glass" ended after the 2012 season. maybe we just got a different "pane'.
|
|
|
Post by totallybolted on Jun 16, 2021 9:15:10 GMT -7
but i thought you said not 100%? I get the point. Its not a good match up, but went is it ever with Hill. My point was to throw some light on the shade. I don't think Bradley was horrible. nor do I think Tranquill was throwing him under the bus. To McRug's point, I agree, it was probably more often then they wanted No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. you and I were part of the few who pointed to the D as bigger issue than the O. On the O it was the OL as the main issue, so I have to grant that. But D had issues all over.
|
|
|
Post by sonorajim on Jun 16, 2021 10:19:44 GMT -7
No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. you and I were part of the few who pointed to the D as bigger issue than the O. On the O it was the OL as the main issue, so I have to grant that. But D had issues all over. It depends on when you're referring to. The D did have issues all over, not all at the same time, like OL.
D was injuries, lack of depth and coaching. Gus' didn't adjust well, didn't utilize less than elite talents well, didn't seem to develop players that we had.
|
|
|
Post by totallybolted on Jun 16, 2021 15:42:33 GMT -7
you and I were part of the few who pointed to the D as bigger issue than the O. On the O it was the OL as the main issue, so I have to grant that. But D had issues all over. It depends on when you're referring to. The D did have issues all over, not all at the same time, like OL.
D was injuries, lack of depth and coaching. Gus' didn't adjust well, didn't utilize less than elite talents well, didn't seem to develop players that we had.
agree. My POV is they cost they bolts more games.
|
|
|
Post by moekid on Jun 16, 2021 19:58:15 GMT -7
but i thought you said not 100%? I get the point. Its not a good match up, but went is it ever with Hill. My point was to throw some light on the shade. I don't think Bradley was horrible. nor do I think Tranquill was throwing him under the bus. To McRug's point, I agree, it was probably more often then they wanted No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. Speaking of Stephen Cooper he is the new head football coach at Francis Parker in San Diego. Gotta start somewhere Stephen!!
|
|
|
Post by moekid on Jun 16, 2021 19:58:52 GMT -7
It depends on when you're referring to. The D did have issues all over, not all at the same time, like OL.
D was injuries, lack of depth and coaching. Gus' didn't adjust well, didn't utilize less than elite talents well, didn't seem to develop players that we had.
agree. My POV is they cost they bolts more games. Preaching to the choir. Been saying this for a while
|
|
cthommes
Drivel Superstar
Posts: 1,391
Member is Online
|
Post by cthommes on Jun 16, 2021 20:04:18 GMT -7
No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. you and I were part of the few who pointed to the D as bigger issue than the O. On the O it was the OL as the main issue, so I have to grant that. But D had issues all over. I was hoping to draw the goalie out of hiding with that. Didn't work. He must still be trying to work out how on God's green earth the Habs are playing Vegas in the conference finals.
|
|
|
Post by joemcrugby on Jun 16, 2021 20:13:41 GMT -7
you and I were part of the few who pointed to the D as bigger issue than the O. On the O it was the OL as the main issue, so I have to grant that. But D had issues all over. I was hoping to draw the goalie out of hiding with that. Didn't work. He must still be trying to work out how on God's green earth the Habs are playing Vegas in the conference finals. Yup, the goalie is busy ... in Vegas with the hosers leading the Knights 3-1 in the 3rd period. If your Canadiens split the first two games, place the mortgage payment on red before you leave town!! 🍺
|
|
cthommes
Drivel Superstar
Posts: 1,391
Member is Online
|
Post by cthommes on Jun 16, 2021 20:15:28 GMT -7
No, not 100% overall. But yes, 110% of the time you don't have a LB responsible to run deep with Tyreek ****ing Hill. On the Bradley was not horrible bit, I agree. He was not horrible. But he (and as a result, the D as a whole) was not a difference maker. He was there. He was blah. That's by design. I'm done with blah. I'm ready to see what's next. Ready to see, heaven forbid, the D make a critical timely play or stop to win us a big game. How long has it been? Stephen Cooper winning the chess match against Peyton Manning? Jesus, was that really over a decade ago? The alternative is just to harp on the other side of the ball and blame it all on oline. Speaking of Stephen Cooper he is the new head football coach at Francis Parker in San Diego. Gotta start somewhere Stephen!! Hey, that place costs way more than the college I dropped out of, sooo...
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 17, 2021 5:05:20 GMT -7
There is a couple of bottom lines to be drawn from all of this. You/they can take some some shots at the old DC. No problem he's gone now, right ? Here comes last year's best DC in the NFL. Should be great, right ? Here's the problem: It's freaking GO time now, with no excuses. If Glass Tranquill wants to say Hill broke his ankle trying to keep up with him, I would believe him. But talky talk is over. The best DC is here, that means failure can only be found in the personnel now. Player ability and execution is now magnified 200%. I think Tranquill is missing that huge point. ”Glass” already? He was 100% healthy his rookie season and freakishly snapped his ankle accident on a slick field out of the starting gate in 2021. Now you're Glass too.
|
|
|
Post by moekid on Jun 17, 2021 7:34:02 GMT -7
”Glass” already? He was 100% healthy his rookie season and freakishly snapped his ankle accident on a slick field out of the starting gate in 2021. Now you're Glass too. Tranquil built himself up a bit. I know Freak’s noticed
|
|