|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 9, 2022 6:18:08 GMT -7
From Twitter: This #Chargers Mike Williams deal gives the team MORE 2022 cap space than the FT, for MORE flexibility in FA and the Draft, and keeps the talent level at WR level (at worst!). For folks not happy with the Mike Williams contract, PLEASE tell me what your alternative plan was! 👇 I'm ok with Mike getting paid but if you want my alternative plan it was 151% Davante Adams. No doubt. Easy question.
|
|
|
|
Post by cthommes on Mar 9, 2022 7:12:08 GMT -7
From Twitter: This #Chargers Mike Williams deal gives the team MORE 2022 cap space than the FT, for MORE flexibility in FA and the Draft, and keeps the talent level at WR level (at worst!). For folks not happy with the Mike Williams contract, PLEASE tell me what your alternative plan was! 👇 I'm ok with Mike getting paid ... This is a pretty substantial shift in position, even for a Freak. |
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Mar 9, 2022 7:52:50 GMT -7
MW was used properly by Staley, with the results to show. Absolutely no reason the believe there will be any change. The 20 mil/4 yr term doesn't seem out of line, actually seems just about what was to be expected. Those thinking Adams from Green Bay would have been a better option, think again, as prying Adams away from Rodgers would have cost way more than 20 mil a year......
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 9, 2022 8:36:10 GMT -7
MW was used properly by Staley, with the results to show. Absolutely no reason the believe there will be any change. The 20 mil/4 yr term doesn't seem out of line, actually seems just about what was to be expected. Those thinking Adams from Green Bay would have been a better option, think again, as prying Adams away from Rodgers would have cost way more than 20 mil a year...... Davante Adams is a WHOLE 'nother level than Mike Williams. MW isn't even the best WR on his own team !!
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 9, 2022 8:38:18 GMT -7
I'm ok with Mike getting paid ... This is a pretty substantial shift in position, even for a Freak. No. Not if you follow my glory. I was down on MW and rightfully so in the past. I predicted a good year for him because he was in HIS CONTRACT YEAR. Right again. If he got around 1172 yards on a team that spreads the ball around, I have no problem with his contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by moekid on Mar 9, 2022 17:59:09 GMT -7
MW was used properly by Staley, with the results to show. Absolutely no reason the believe there will be any change. The 20 mil/4 yr term doesn't seem out of line, actually seems just about what was to be expected. Those thinking Adams from Green Bay would have been a better option, think again, as prying Adams away from Rodgers would have cost way more than 20 mil a year...... It’s 3 years |
|
