|
|
Post by headtrip on Jun 12, 2019 10:17:53 GMT -7
That would be ideal but circumstances are impossible to predict. All I know is a team without an advantage over our Oline will have nothing to exploit. Whether that's because the Charger line is unexpectedly good or the opposite front is mediocre/injured I can't say. Predict.....impossible as you say. I don't buy the belief that the Bolts' singular weakness is their OL, it is just the glaring weakness. After the OL, any perspective weakness' are diminished by the simple fact the depth players are almost as talented as the starting players, making exploitation not an easy task. TE and DT are two that might concern me..... DL is my 2nd concern. TE is an odd choice. Depth is a concern at multiple positions but the top of the chart looks at least decent across the board. Maybe not so much at FB and P. |
|
|
|
Post by Chargeroo on Jun 12, 2019 10:18:53 GMT -7
Internal ? No idea what you mean. The OL group is not very talented, yep, that would be internal to the Bolts' team.  ? I don't know what you are talking about...... 12-4.....you love that record, and obviously still behind on the conversation.....we are talking PO's son, not regular season. Do you have any doubt that the Bolts make the PO's, probably not. So start focusing on how will they win games in the PO's with that crappy OL group. That will be the weakness in the PO's.Here's the post that made me write about the OL. Guess who wrote that.
Here's the post that made me write about the OL. Guess who wrote that.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 12, 2019 12:28:15 GMT -7
Predict.....impossible as you say. I don't buy the belief that the Bolts' singular weakness is their OL, it is just the glaring weakness. After the OL, any perspective weakness' are diminished by the simple fact the depth players are almost as talented as the starting players, making exploitation not an easy task. TE and DT are two that might concern me..... DL is my 2nd concern. TE is an odd choice. Depth is a concern at multiple positions but the top of the chart looks at least decent across the board. Maybe not so much at FB and P. I'll let you in on some Goalie mentality. He's all ticked off that they didn't draft a TE, as he predicted, and really miffed that they didn't take TE Fant who he swore by.
Its all very very easy for me.
One Emperor
|
|
|
|
Post by cthommes on Jun 12, 2019 21:18:26 GMT -7
You cant win without off line. Good point. I bet a team would be fine if they didn't have any db's though. Or possibly even wide receivers. |
|
|
|
Post by headtrip on Jun 12, 2019 22:14:14 GMT -7
You cant win without off line. Good point. I bet a team would be fine if they didn't have any db's though. Or possibly even wide receivers. I've seen enough football to know there is absolutely no one thing a team can't win without. It's gonna come down to the matchups. |
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 13, 2019 7:53:59 GMT -7
Good point. I bet a team would be fine if they didn't have any db's though. Or possibly even wide receivers. I've seen enough football to know there is absolutely no one thing a team can't win without. It's gonna come down to the matchups. You weren't able to watch the no LB's at Baltimore win ?
|
|
|
|
Post by headtrip on Jun 13, 2019 8:15:24 GMT -7
I've seen enough football to know there is absolutely no one thing a team can't win without. It's gonna come down to the matchups. You weren't able to watch the no LB's at Baltimore win ? I did. I was pumped. |
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jun 13, 2019 8:22:19 GMT -7
Predict.....impossible as you say. I don't buy the belief that the Bolts' singular weakness is their OL, it is just the glaring weakness. After the OL, any perspective weakness' are diminished by the simple fact the depth players are almost as talented as the starting players, making exploitation not an easy task. TE and DT are two that might concern me..... DL is my 2nd concern. TE is an odd choice. Depth is a concern at multiple positions but the top of the chart looks at least decent across the board. Maybe not so much at FB and P. I think we saw how much the loss of HH impacted the offence. Take HH away once again, and there is concern once again, as the depth at TE isn't awesome but it is enough. We are splitting hairs though, as I have said earlier, the only glaring issue is the OL, in my view. "After the OL, any perspective weakness' are diminished by the simple fact the depth players are almost as talented as the starting players,...."
|
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jun 13, 2019 8:24:43 GMT -7
DL is my 2nd concern. TE is an odd choice. Depth is a concern at multiple positions but the top of the chart looks at least decent across the board. Maybe not so much at FB and P. I'll let you in on some Goalie mentality. He's all ticked off that they didn't draft a TE, as he predicted, and really miffed that they didn't take TE Fant who he swore by.
Its all very very easy for me.
One Emperor
Actually, I would have chosen an OT.......see my draft in the 'do over' thread created by Boltnut I believe. I don't get "ticked off" by any of this. I do think Fant will be a good player.....
|
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jun 13, 2019 8:29:23 GMT -7
Internal ? No idea what you mean. The OL group is not very talented, yep, that would be internal to the Bolts' team. ? I don't know what you are talking about...... 12-4.....you love that record, and obviously still behind on the conversation.....we are talking PO's son, not regular season. Do you have any doubt that the Bolts make the PO's, probably not. So start focusing on how will they win games in the PO's with that crappy OL group. That will be the weakness in the PO's.Here's the post that made me write about the OL. Guess who wrote that.
Here's the post that made me write about the OL. Guess who wrote that.
Yea, but nowhere in my post is any blame assigned to the OL group for the loss in NE.......and the post you are quoting is looking forward, not backward.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 13, 2019 8:48:00 GMT -7
You weren't able to watch the no LB's at Baltimore win ? I did. I was pumped. Such a great game for our Bolties.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 13, 2019 8:50:24 GMT -7
DL is my 2nd concern. TE is an odd choice. Depth is a concern at multiple positions but the top of the chart looks at least decent across the board. Maybe not so much at FB and P. I'll let you in on some Goalie mentality. He's all ticked off that they didn't draft a TE, as he predicted, and really miffed that they didn't take TE Fant who he swore by.
Its all very very easy for me.
One Emperor
You people should be paying me for this kind of brilliant insight.
Village taxes going up by September. Not exactly news.............well not NEW news or anything............
|
|
|
|
Post by eurobolt on Jun 13, 2019 10:32:37 GMT -7
Good point. I bet a team would be fine if they didn't have any db's though. Or possibly even wide receivers. Funny guy you  my post was a direct reaction to Okung injury you have missed sir.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jun 13, 2019 10:44:42 GMT -7
Funny guy you my post was a direct reaction to Okung injury you have missed sir. "Okung Injury" bleh. Gates taught him how to skip camps until Sept.
#Notfallingforit
|
|
|
|
Post by eurobolt on Jun 13, 2019 10:52:19 GMT -7
Funny guy you my post was a direct reaction to Okung injury you have missed sir. "Okung Injury" bleh. Gates taught him how to skip camps until Sept.
#Notfallingforit
@easymoneysniper could ask you for another opinion
|
|
? I don't know what you are talking about......
my post was a direct reaction to Okung injury you have missed sir.