|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jan 8, 2021 8:22:58 GMT -7
Would you fire Tomlin or not? No way. He's never had a losing season at Pitt. !
|
|
|
|
Post by lightsout42 on Jan 8, 2021 8:30:56 GMT -7
Would you fire Tomlin or not? No way. He's never had a losing season at Pitt. ! Right -- you absolutely don't fire him. Garrett's regular season W-L% is .559 and playoff W-L% is .400. Tomlin's is .650 and .533. Better, certainly. But it's not consistently winning. Indeed, one SB in 13 season (14 if they don't make it this year). Belichick, Tomline, Reid -- these are your consistent winners. Again, either poach one or pick someone who isn't *yet* a consistent NFL winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Jan 8, 2021 8:52:23 GMT -7
No way. He's never had a losing season at Pitt. ! Right -- you absolutely don't fire him. Garrett's regular season W-L% is .559 and playoff W-L% is .400. Tomlin's is .650 and .533. Better, certainly. But it's not consistently winning. Indeed, one SB in 13 season (14 if they don't make it this year). Belichick, Tomline, Reid -- these are your consistent winners. Again, either poach one or pick someone who isn't *yet* a consistent NFL winner. This is such a terrible argument... Apples and oranges.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightsout42 on Jan 8, 2021 9:00:55 GMT -7
Right -- you absolutely don't fire him. Garrett's regular season W-L% is .559 and playoff W-L% is .400. Tomlin's is .650 and .533. Better, certainly. But it's not consistently winning. Indeed, one SB in 13 season (14 if they don't make it this year). Belichick, Tomline, Reid -- these are your consistent winners. Again, either poach one or pick someone who isn't *yet* a consistent NFL winner. This is such a terrible argument... Apples and oranges. No, it just that you don’t understand the argument and continue to be inconsistent. However, I’m perfectly happy to stop arguing. There are more important things. |
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Jan 8, 2021 9:31:32 GMT -7
I get what your saying kinda... maybe... I just don't see how its relevant between the two. You say Garrett had a history of getting Dallas to the playoffs right? You think this is a reason we should look at him? I said Garrett has only been in the playoffs 5 times and doesn't get very far... You come back with Tomlin not always winning playoff games, right? So? Who cares, Tomlin has a Superbowl, Garrett does not. OF COURSE I DON"T FIRE TOMLIN. As freak says, Tomlin has NEVER had a losing season in Pitt. No I don't fire him...
All I'm saying is Garrett is more of the same... pass and pass thank you.
Is that the jist of it? If not then no I don't understand your argument.
Agree to disagree my friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Jan 9, 2021 7:49:02 GMT -7
Great video for those of you not on the Meyer bus... They make a pretty good case against him. They think Bienemy for us, just like I do.
|
|
|
|
Post by joemcrugby on Jan 10, 2021 0:54:10 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jan 11, 2021 12:16:52 GMT -7
Los Angeles Chargers: Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech
Christian Darrisaw was a massive riser this season. At 6-foot-5, 314, Darrisaw has optimal size and length, and he also moves well. He plays with good power and leverage, and he has the upside to be a bookend blocker for a decade-plus.
|
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jan 11, 2021 12:27:40 GMT -7
Los Angeles Chargers: Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech Christian Darrisaw was a massive riser this season. At 6-foot-5, 314, Darrisaw has optimal size and length, and he also moves well. He plays with good power and leverage, and he has the upside to be a bookend blocker for a decade-plus. I like Darrisaw as an OT option, and figure drafting 13th, there will be decent OT's available. The only real question is what other talent will be there to consider.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jan 11, 2021 14:21:24 GMT -7
Los Angeles Chargers: Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech Christian Darrisaw was a massive riser this season. At 6-foot-5, 314, Darrisaw has optimal size and length, and he also moves well. He plays with good power and leverage, and he has the upside to be a bookend blocker for a decade-plus. I like Darrisaw as an OT option, and figure drafting 13th, there will be decent OT's available. The only real question is what other talent will be there to consider. There are some hot CB's that could easily land at 13
|
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jan 11, 2021 15:04:59 GMT -7
I like Darrisaw as an OT option, and figure drafting 13th, there will be decent OT's available. The only real question is what other talent will be there to consider. There are some hot CB's that could easily land at 13 Yep, I have a feeling there will be a CB of great talent there, but the lack of talent at OT is pretty significant. The club has a number of ways to go with their picks, should be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by afboltfan on Jan 11, 2021 16:33:39 GMT -7
There are some hot CB's that could easily land at 13 Yep, I have a feeling there will be a CB of great talent there, but the lack of talent at OT is pretty significant. The club has a number of ways to go with their picks, should be interesting. I honestly feel like that is every year... We seem to always fall just outside quality OT pick position every time we really need one.
|
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Jan 11, 2021 18:49:49 GMT -7
Yep, I have a feeling there will be a CB of great talent there, but the lack of talent at OT is pretty significant. The club has a number of ways to go with their picks, should be interesting. I honestly feel like that is every year... We seem to always fall just outside quality OT pick position every time we really need one. I was actually referring to the club roster. According to the draft pundits, this draft has a very deep class of OT's. Regardless, I feel investing in OL x4 is a wise move this draft, and try for at least one OL in FA. They won't do that, but should..... Instead we will see a CB, DE, OL, WR, LB, DL, RB....... not in that order, rather collectively. This is why the OL issue never gets solved. They make an OL pick, and miss on it, then shrug and hope for next year. Sad.....
|
|
|
|
Post by jwr10x on Jan 11, 2021 20:46:37 GMT -7
This next year there may well be a few top notch OL free agents. Just looking at Pittsburg they have both LT Alejandro Villanueva and RT Matt Feiler UFA . They currently have 35 under contract for next year and are already close to 22mil over the projected cap.
New Orleans is 99Mil over the cap.
|
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Jan 12, 2021 3:38:27 GMT -7
This next year there may well be a few top notch OL free agents. Just looking at Pittsburg they have both LT Alejandro Villanueva and RT Matt Feiler UFA . They currently have 35 under contract for next year and are already close to 22mil over the projected cap. New Orleans is 99Mil over the cap. Holy smokes !! No wonder Ben is crying and Brees looks scared !!!
|
|
