|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 2:30:00 GMT -7
When FA opened we were one of like 3-5 teams that talked to Suh. I think TT wanted to wait for later to get his contract at lower rates. I hope we are still in touch and in the hunt. I know SuperBowl playing Suh has game left and would be another Telesco 2 year special. TT, Pay the Man !! TT, draft the man ! Are you switching your mock for DL in the first two rounds, or staying in the 3rd ? We are in DL need.
|
|
|
Post by woodeye on Mar 22, 2019 2:42:35 GMT -7
Are you switching your mock for DL in the first two rounds, or staying in the 3rd ? We are in DL need. Ha ha...I love my mock...know your big board. Saunders, a Sammy Small School Special, projects to both IDL spots. Once he learns how to disengage from blockers better, I see ProBowl potential. The athleticism is there, Freak !
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 5:27:08 GMT -7
Are you switching your mock for DL in the first two rounds, or staying in the 3rd ? We are in DL need. Ha ha...I love my mock...know your big board. Saunders, a Sammy Small School Special, projects to both IDL spots. Once he learns how to disengage from blockers better, I see ProBowl potential. The athleticism is there, Freak ! Typical Small School Sammy. Plays way to high so he's easily blocked. KC Oline isn't playing Montana State son. Destruct.
Do you know that big board ?
|
|
|
Post by woodeye on Mar 22, 2019 5:31:49 GMT -7
Ha ha...I love my mock...know your big board. Saunders, a Sammy Small School Special, projects to both IDL spots. Once he learns how to disengage from blockers better, I see ProBowl potential. The athleticism is there, Freak ! Typical Small School Sammy. Plays way to high so he's easily blocked. KC Oline isn't playing Montana State son. Destruct.
Do you know that big board ?
Yes I do. A penetrator is a good get.
|
|
|
Post by totallybolted on Mar 22, 2019 5:49:47 GMT -7
I think Suh is more name than game at this point, but he should be effective alongside Bosa and Ingram. That's where I'll disagree. He is still an impact player. As you said paired up with other impact players will be effective. I think very effective. Disc, Suh hasn't shown he want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He already got that once and played it. His benefit to the bolts would be pretty clear IMO.
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 5:53:40 GMT -7
I think Suh is more name than game at this point, but he should be effective alongside Bosa and Ingram. That's where I'll disagree. He is still an impact player. As you said paired up with other impact players will be effective. I think very effective. Disc, Suh hasn't shown he want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He already got that once and played it. His benefit to the bolts would be pretty clear IMO. You couple this with our need on the DL, and its Taylor-Made for us to sign.
|
|
|
Post by totallybolted on Mar 22, 2019 5:58:00 GMT -7
That's where I'll disagree. He is still an impact player. As you said paired up with other impact players will be effective. I think very effective. Disc, Suh hasn't shown he want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He already got that once and played it. His benefit to the bolts would be pretty clear IMO. You couple this with our need on the DL, and its Taylor-Made for us to sign. There is always a risk when signing older FA's like SUH. I just think it's less than the risk in this case of picking a draftee who has the impact you need. The Bolts could go DT at 28 still with SUH. Image the possibilities there.
|
|
|
Post by topcat on Mar 22, 2019 7:25:01 GMT -7
You couple this with our need on the DL, and its Taylor-Made for us to sign. There is always a risk when signing older FA's like SUH. I just think it's less than the risk in this case of picking a draftee who has the impact you need. The Bolts could go DT at 28 still with SUH. Image the possibilities there. I like the idea of doubling up at DT...Sign Suh, AND draft someone like Wren or Saunders in round 3...time to reload...
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Mar 22, 2019 7:37:51 GMT -7
When FA opened we were one of like 3-5 teams that talked to Suh. I think TT wanted to wait for later to get his contract at lower rates. I hope we are still in touch and in the hunt. I know SuperBowl playing Suh has game left and would be another Telesco 2 year special. TT, Pay the Man !! TT, draft the man ! This is much more likely to be TT's approach.
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Mar 22, 2019 7:46:14 GMT -7
I think Suh is more name than game at this point, but he should be effective alongside Bosa and Ingram. That's where I'll disagree. He is still an impact player. As you said paired up with other impact players will be effective. I think very effective. Disc, Suh hasn't shown he want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He already got that once and played it. His benefit to the bolts would be pretty clear IMO. I just think Suh is closing in on the end, and as such, why would TT want to commit the money that it would take. I know, everyone thinks Suh would be the solution to the DT problem, I don't see it. TT should just take Wilkins @ 28th, and hopefully the problem is solved for years. I think Wilkins falls to 28th, but if not, Boltnut's guy Lawrence would be a better way to spend than paying Suh.
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 7:55:56 GMT -7
That's where I'll disagree. He is still an impact player. As you said paired up with other impact players will be effective. I think very effective. Disc, Suh hasn't shown he want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. He already got that once and played it. His benefit to the bolts would be pretty clear IMO. I just think Suh is closing in on the end, and as such, why would TT want to commit the money that it would take. I know, everyone thinks Suh would be the solution to the DT problem, I don't see it. TT should just take Wilkins @ 28th, and hopefully the problem is solved for years. I think Wilkins falls to 28th, but if not, Boltnut's guy Lawrence would be a better way to spend than paying Suh. You think everyone is at the end. You said Weddle was over days before he signed a 10 million dollar contract with the Rams.
Suh is not over. He's just not getting the 11 Million dollars a year that he is used to. He has dropped into that next level down in Free agency. That is all.
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 7:56:53 GMT -7
You couple this with our need on the DL, and its Taylor-Made for us to sign. There is always a risk when signing older FA's like SUH. I just think it's less than the risk in this case of picking a draftee who has the impact you need. The Bolts could go DT at 28 still with SUH. Image the possibilities there. Oh, heaven forbid we did BOTH ?!?!?!?!?!?! That's just crazy talk there !
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Mar 22, 2019 8:07:22 GMT -7
I just think Suh is closing in on the end, and as such, why would TT want to commit the money that it would take. I know, everyone thinks Suh would be the solution to the DT problem, I don't see it. TT should just take Wilkins @ 28th, and hopefully the problem is solved for years. I think Wilkins falls to 28th, but if not, Boltnut's guy Lawrence would be a better way to spend than paying Suh. You think everyone is at the end. You said Weddle was over days before he signed a 10 million dollar contract with the Rams.
Suh is not over. He's just not getting the 11 Million dollars a year that he is used to. He has dropped into that next level down in Free agency. That is all.
I believe I am pretty well known for not being a big endorser of signing FA's to big dollar/term contracts. My reasoning is the return rarely justifies the cost. * I did not say Weddle was over, I said Weddle was looking for a new team to scam another few million out of, or something along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by chargerfreak on Mar 22, 2019 8:14:41 GMT -7
You think everyone is at the end. You said Weddle was over days before he signed a 10 million dollar contract with the Rams.
Suh is not over. He's just not getting the 11 Million dollars a year that he is used to. He has dropped into that next level down in Free agency. That is all.
I believe I am pretty well known for not being a big endorser of signing FA's to big dollar/term contracts. My reasoning is the return rarely justifies the cost. * I did not say Weddle was over, I said Weddle was looking for a new team to scam another few million out of, or something along those lines. The market has forced Suh's money way down. He is still a big nasty too much to handle violent DT. Really rugged against runs up the middle. I would feel so much better if TT would pull this off. Hope.
|
|
|
Post by frozendisc on Mar 22, 2019 8:20:26 GMT -7
I believe I am pretty well known for not being a big endorser of signing FA's to big dollar/term contracts. My reasoning is the return rarely justifies the cost. * I did not say Weddle was over, I said Weddle was looking for a new team to scam another few million out of, or something along those lines. The market has forced Suh's money way down. He is still a big nasty too much to handle violent DT. Really rugged against runs up the middle. I would feel so much better if TT would pull this off. Hope.
I would prefer the DT solution to be found via draft.......
|
|